Current:Home > ContactColorado Supreme Court bans Trump from the state’s ballot under Constitution’s insurrection clause -MoneyBase
Colorado Supreme Court bans Trump from the state’s ballot under Constitution’s insurrection clause
View
Date:2025-04-26 08:13:57
DENVER (AP) — The Colorado Supreme Court on Tuesday declared former President Donald Trump ineligible for the White House under the U.S. Constitution’s insurrection clause and removed him from the state’s presidential primary ballot, setting up a likely showdown in the nation’s highest court to decide whether the front-runner for the GOP nomination can remain in the race.
The decision from a court whose justices were all appointed by Democratic governors marks the first time in history that Section 3 of the 14th Amendment has been used to disqualify a presidential candidate.
“A majority of the court holds that Trump is disqualified from holding the office of president under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment,” the court wrote in its 4-3 decision.
Colorado’s highest court overturned a ruling from a district court judge who found that Trump incited an insurrection for his role in the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol, but said he could not be barred from the ballot because it was unclear that the provision was intended to cover the presidency.
The court stayed its decision until Jan. 4, or until the U.S. Supreme Court rules on the case.
“We do not reach these conclusions lightly,” wrote the court’s majority. “We are mindful of the magnitude and weight of the questions now before us. We are likewise mindful of our solemn duty to apply the law, without fear or favor, and without being swayed by public reaction to the decisions that the law mandates we reach.”
Trump’s attorneys had promised to appeal any disqualification immediately to the nation’s highest court, which has the final say about constitutional matters. His campaign said it was working on a response to the ruling.
Trump lost Colorado by 13 percentage points in 2020 and doesn’t need the state to win next year’s presidential election. But the danger for the former president is that more courts and election officials will follow Colorado’s lead and exclude Trump from must-win states.
Colorado officials say the issue must be settled by Jan. 5, the deadline for the state to print its presidential primary ballots.
Dozens of lawsuits have been filed nationally to disqualify Trump under Section 3, which was designed to keep former Confederates from returning to government after the Civil War. It bars from office anyone who swore an oath to “support” the Constitution and then “engaged in insurrection or rebellion” against it, and has been used only a handful of times since the decade after the Civil War.
The Colorado case is the first where the plaintiffs succeeded. After a weeklong hearing in November, District Judge Sarah B. Wallace found that Trump indeed had “engaged in insurrection” by inciting the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol, and her ruling that kept him on the ballot was a fairly technical one.
Trump’s attorneys convinced Wallace that, because the language in Section 3 refers to “officers of the United States” who take an oath to “support” the Constitution, it must not apply to the president, who is not included as an “officer of the United States” elsewhere in the document and whose oath is to “preserve, protect and defend” the Constitution.
The provision also says offices covered include senator, representative, electors of the president and vice president, and all others “under the United States,” but doesn’t name the presidency.
The state’s highest court didn’t agree, siding with attorneys for six Colorado Republican and unaffiliated voters who argued that it was nonsensical to imagine the framers of the amendment, fearful of former Confederates returning to power, would bar them from low-level offices but not the highest one in the land.
“You’d be saying a rebel who took up arms against the government couldn’t be a county sheriff, but could be the president,” attorney Jason Murray said in arguments before the court in early December.
veryGood! (19)
Related
- Israel lets Palestinians go back to northern Gaza for first time in over a year as cease
- What to know about 4 criminal investigations into former President Donald Trump
- One killed after gunfire erupts in Florida Walmart
- Climate activists target nation's big banks, urging divestment from fossil fuels
- Why Sean "Diddy" Combs Is Being Given a Laptop in Jail Amid Witness Intimidation Fears
- Adam Sandler's Daughter Sunny Sandler Is All Grown Up During Rare Red Carpet Appearance
- See Jennifer Lawrence and Andy Cohen Kiss During OMG WWHL Moment
- Barack Obama drops summer playlist including Ice Spice, Luke Combs, Tina Turner and Peso Pluma
- A South Texas lawmaker’s 15
- Inside Clean Energy: From Sweden, a Potential Breakthrough for Clean Steel
Ranking
- Buckingham Palace staff under investigation for 'bar brawl'
- The demise of Credit Suisse
- Inside Clean Energy: Solar Industry Wins Big in Kentucky Ruling
- Inside Clean Energy: Offshore Wind Takes a Big Step Forward, but Remains Short of the Long-Awaited Boom
- Senate begins final push to expand Social Security benefits for millions of people
- One Last Climate Warning in New IPCC Report: ‘Now or Never’
- Tom Brady Mourns Death of Former Patriots Teammate Ryan Mallett After Apparent Drowning
- Barack Obama drops summer playlist including Ice Spice, Luke Combs, Tina Turner and Peso Pluma
Recommendation
Tarte Shape Tape Concealer Sells Once Every 4 Seconds: Get 50% Off Before It's Gone
Binance lawsuit, bank failures and oil drilling
Can the World’s Most Polluting Heavy Industries Decarbonize?
Judge rules Fox hosts' claims about Dominion were false, says trial can proceed
Are Instagram, Facebook and WhatsApp down? Meta says most issues resolved after outages
Still trying to quit that gym membership? The FTC is proposing a rule that could help
The Biden administration sells oil and gas leases in the Gulf of Mexico
Trump adds attorney John Lauro to legal team for special counsel's 2020 election probe